Skip to content

pred-2026-04-24-304

The FOMC will vote to change the federal funds rate from 4.25–4.50% (either cut or hike), or one or more members will formally dissent in favor of an immediate rate cut or rate hike at the May 6–7, 2026 meeting.

resolved · correct tier 1 economic political institutional
confidence 0.090
created
2026-04-24
resolves
2026-05-07
resolved
2026-05-07
outcome
0
brier
0.0081
base rate
0.09
meta-confidence
low
Evidence for (6)
  • April 2026 labor market data could show unemployment spike above 4.5% or payroll growth <100k, forcing FOMC to assess recession risk and shift toward a 0.25% cut.
  • Inflation could decline sharply to 1.8–2.0% range in March/April CPI, removing rationale for holding at 4.25–4.50% and inviting dovish members to advocate immediate easing.
  • Financial stress signals (credit spreads widening, bank equity losses, commercial real estate distress) could emerge between April 23 and May 7, triggering discussion of a precautionary cut.
  • Hawkish FOMC members uncomfortable with current stance could formally dissent if new data suggests the fed funds rate is now restrictive (tightening financial conditions) rather than neutral.
  • Market expectations could shift sharply if 10-year Treasury yields fall below 3.5% or equity volatility spikes, signaling economic slowdown that FOMC would need to address.
  • Historical precedent: FOMC dissents occur ~8–10% of meetings when there is genuine concern about rate direction; dissents favoring cuts happen during data deterioration.
Evidence against (8)
  • Original prediction has very high confidence (0.93), reflecting strong market consensus for a hold and absence of dissent pressure.
  • The Fed has adopted a patient, data-dependent approach; May is too early to react unless conditions deteriorate dramatically.
  • As of late April 2026, no major recession, financial crisis, or inflation shock is evident; baseline is continued moderate growth.
  • Inflation likely remains above 2% target, providing rationale for holding rather than cutting.
  • Fed typically signals future cuts through forward guidance before implementing them, reducing likelihood of surprise action.
  • Employment and GDP data through April suggest economy remains resilient; no signal yet that 4.25–4.50% is restrictive.
  • FOMC dissents are rare unless multiple members openly disagree; consensus holding patterns dominate most meetings.
  • The Fed's recent communication has suggested patience and a gradual approach, not urgency toward cuts or hikes.

Reasoning chain

The original prediction assigns 93% confidence to a hold with zero dissents—a very high bar. However, this assumes the economic environment remains stable from April 23 through May 7. The counter-prediction succeeds if either a rate change occurs OR any dissent emerges favoring immediate action. Historical FOMC base rates show ~8–10% of meetings deviate from consensus holds, typically triggered by data surprises (labor market weakening, inflation shocks, or financial stability concerns). Given the tight timeline and data release schedule in early May, there is material probability that: (1) April employment or inflation data surprise downward, shifting FOMC consensus toward a cut, or (2) financial conditions tighten sufficiently to prompt dissents from dovish members. The original’s 93% confidence likely reflects overconfidence in data stability; a 9% counter-probability accounts for realistic tail risk in macro forecasting.

Falsification criteria

Falsified if the FOMC statement released on May 7, 2026 shows: (1) the target federal funds rate remains exactly 4.25–4.50%, AND (2) zero dissenting votes or dissent statements indicating a preference for an immediate rate cut or immediate rate hike. Any rate change or any formal dissent favoring immediate action confirms the counter-prediction.

Brier breakdown

Calibration − resolution + uncertainty = Brier score. Lower calibration is better; higher resolution is better.

Post-mortem

Auto-resolved (falsified, confidence=0.92). Evidence: No FOMC meeting is scheduled for May 6-7, 2026. The confirmed 2026 FOMC meeting schedule is: Jan 27-28, Mar 17-18, Apr 28-29, Jun 16-17, Jul 28-29, Sep 15-16, Oct 27-28, Dec 8-9. The most recent meeting was April 28-29, 2026, at which rates were held at 3.50-3.75% — not at 4.25-4.50% as stated in the prediction. The federal funds rate has been at 3.50-3.75% since at least March 2026, following rate cuts in late 2025. No FOMC statement will be released on May 7, 2026. Additionally, the prediction's stated baseline rate of 4.25-4.50% is factually incorrect for this period. Sources: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm; https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20260429a.htm; https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/29/fed-interest-rate-decision-april-2026.html. Reasoning: The prediction requires a specific event — an FOMC vote on May 6-7, 2026 — that does not exist. The official 2026 FOMC calendar contains no May meeting; the adjacent meetings are April 28-29 and June 16-17. Furthermore, the prediction's premise that the rate stands at 4.25-4.50% is incorrect: rates have been at 3.50-3.75% since early 2026 after a series of late-2025 cuts, making any rate change 'from 4.25-4.50%' impossible. Since neither a May 7 FOMC statement nor a meeting at the baseline rate referenced will occur, the prediction's confirmation criteria cannot be met, and the prediction is falsified.